Haman was a high-ranking official in the Persian court of King Ahasuerus.
He is introduced as an “Agagite” and elevated above other nobles (Esther 3:1).
After conflict with Mordecai, he sought state authorization to destroy the Jews in the empire.
His plans were overturned through Esther’s intervention and royal decree.
Haman’s rise and fall in Esther portrays how imperial power can be used for targeted violence yet can be reversed within royal politics and providential timing.
“So they hanged Haman on the gallows that he had prepared for Mordecai. Then the wrath of the king abated.” — Esther 7:10, ESV
Answer the questions below. When you choose an option, you will see the result and an explanation.
1. What method did Haman use to set the date for the planned destruction of the Jews throughout the Persian provinces?
2. What ultimately happened to Haman after his plans against the Jews were overturned?