Core Teaching: Jesus portrays a landowner who hires workers at different times of day yet pays each the same daily wage. The point is not that God ignores justice, but that God’s generosity exceeds what strict merit-based expectations would predict. Those who worked longer feel wronged—not because they were underpaid, but because they resent the landowner’s goodness toward others. The parable confronts a heart that treats God as an employer whose “fairness” must align with our comparisons, rather than as the sovereign Lord who freely gives according to His own goodness.
This teaching coheres with the gospel’s insistence that entry into the kingdom is a gift (grace), and that God may grant equal standing to those who come “late” without diminishing what the “first” have received. It warns disciples against envy and entitlement, especially in matters of reward, status, and perceived spiritual seniority.
Key Elements or Argument:
(Responsible reading avoids turning each hiring hour into a detailed code for stages of life or church history; the text’s emphasis falls on God’s generosity and the disciples’ posture toward it.)
A denarius was a common day’s wage for laborers in the Roman world. Day workers were economically vulnerable; being hired even late in the day could mean food for one’s household. This background sharpens the force of the landowner’s generosity: he is not merely “nice,” but supplies what is needed, while also asserting his right to do good with his own resources.
“Am I not allowed to do what I choose with what belongs to me? Or do you begrudge my generosity?” — Matthew 20:15
Answer the questions below. When you choose an option, you will see the result and an explanation.
1. In the parable, what wage did the landowner agree to pay the first workers?
2. Why did the workers who labored longer feel wronged in the story?