Core Teaching:
Jesus answers a legal question (“What must I do to inherit eternal life?”) by pressing the hearer toward the heart of God’s law: love for God and love for neighbor (Luke 10:27). When the lawyer tries to narrow the command (“And who is my neighbor?”), Jesus widens it decisively. The parable teaches that “neighbor” is not merely a category to define but a calling to embody—especially toward the vulnerable and the socially excluded. Mercy is not optional piety; it is the fitting expression of a life aligned with God’s will.
At the same time, the parable does not present mercy as a way to earn salvation by works. In context, Jesus exposes how self-justifying approaches to the law can avoid its true demands. The story functions as both revelation (what God’s love looks like) and confrontation (how easily religious identity can coexist with lovelessness).
Key Elements or Argument:
Jews and Samaritans had longstanding hostility rooted in historical, ethnic, and religious conflict. By making a Samaritan the model of neighbor-love, Jesus deliberately confronts prejudice and shows that mercy fulfills the law’s intent more truly than status or religious proximity.
“Which of these three, do you think, proved to be a neighbor to the man who fell among the robbers?” — Luke 10:36
Answer the questions below. When you choose an option, you will see the result and an explanation.
1. What question did the lawyer ask Jesus that led into the parable’s teaching?
2. According to the key memory verse, what question does Jesus ask about the three people in the story?